Lefora Free Forum
50 views

Legend of the Seeker

Page 1
posts 1–5 of 5
rookie - admin
5 posts

So what are people thinking about this latest in pulp-quality sword & sorcery television?

I've seen the first three episodes now and I have to say that I don't think I'll be "Seeking" out any more of it. The problem with the show is that it's just to damn bland. It's not doing anything new -- it's the same old boring story style. That might have worked in the 80s or 90s, it might have worked for Herc and Xena, but these days television needs to have more going on if they want to compete with all the options viewers have these days. As it is, I would say that your basic television fan would probably get more entertainment out of playing World of Warcraft for an hour than they would from an episode of "Legend of the Seeker."

Anyone see it differently?

__________________
Regards, Dennis Castello -- "A movie isn't about what it's about, it's about how it's about it." -- Roger Ebert
novice - admin
32 posts

I have to agree it is cashing in on a genre. They got me to watch once playing on my love of costumes and swordfights, but after one I am done with it.

Its too bad I would make room for a fantasy/medieval series if it had some content.

novice - founder
50 posts

Legend of the stinker ah seeker... man I love love love the idea...I hate hate hate what they did

rookie - admin
5 posts

Glad to see you guys agree -- thought I might be bruising some Early-Modern-Age feelings here. I have two problems with the show:

1) The Characters
One of my favorite screenwriting books likes to remind us that while it's hard to create truly unique stories, it's much easier, in fact it's necessary, to try to create truly unique characters. Think about shows like Dexter, The Shield, The Sopranos, the UK Life on Mars, and Battlestar Galactica. In the case of the last example, why was it that the female characters, the President, Number 6, Boomer/Athena, Starbuck, etc. ended up taking over the show? They were the unique ones of the bunch. LotS just doesn't have unique enough characters. They are flat and bland.

2) Simplistic Plots
The days of an A story carrying an episode are long since over. The days of an A and a B story carrying an episode are over as well. These days you have to have A, B, C, and D, or more, stories to keep an audience involved. I could go on and on about this but I will leave it at that for now.

Anyone see it differently?

__________________
Regards, Dennis Castello -- "A movie isn't about what it's about, it's about how it's about it." -- Roger Ebert
novice - founder
50 posts

I think you hit on something very important big D

Simple vs Simplistic

although I have a big heard for projects like this. I think you have to have attempts like this to move the industry down the road to what I would like to call the big project. I cannot overlook the Simple vs Simplistic battle going on here.

There are moments when things seem to work but there seems to be no context to limit anyone powers. The magic/mystic people will just be a plot device to move the story or solve the problem when needed.

Worse to me is that there is no sense of a great struggle the main character is on. No map of the world and we are here and have to get there. No building up friends and getting ready for the war against Evil.

Ok I have said enough.

Page 1
posts 1–5 of 5

This Topic Is Locked To Guest Posts

It's been a while since this topic was active, if you'd like to get it going again, please post as a registered member

join now